The Supreme Court has decided to proceed with the case challenging the constitutional amendment that would lead to the disqualification of MPs if they change parties or are expelled from their political party.
The petition was filed by former MP Ali Hussain, who described the decision as a major victory for the people and the Constitution.
During Tuesday night's hearing, the Attorney General's Office argued that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. However, the Supreme Court ruled that it has the authority to proceed with the matter.
Speaking to Rajje TV, Ali Hussain, a lawyer and former Kendhoo Constituency MP, said the ruling was a crucial step in upholding the Constitution. He said the verdict ensures constitutional amendments can be challenged in court, preventing arbitrary changes.
He stated that if amendments cannot be challenged, anyone could modify the Constitution as they wish. He further noted that the court's decision reaffirms that constitutional amendments must align with the basic structure and fundamental characteristics of the Constitution.
During the hearing, Chief Justice Ahmed Muthasim Adnan stated that the full bench of the court unanimously decided to move forward with the case. The panel includes Justices Dr. Azmiralda Zahir, Aisha Shujoon Mohamed, Mahaz Ali Zahir, Husnu Suood, Ali Rasheed Hussain, and Dr. Mohamed Ibrahim.
The case marks a significant legal battle over parliamentary representation and constitutional authority, with the Supreme Court now set to review the amendment’s validity.
The petition was filed by former MP Ali Hussain, who described the decision as a major victory for the people and the Constitution.
During Tuesday night's hearing, the Attorney General's Office argued that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. However, the Supreme Court ruled that it has the authority to proceed with the matter.
Speaking to Rajje TV, Ali Hussain, a lawyer and former Kendhoo Constituency MP, said the ruling was a crucial step in upholding the Constitution. He said the verdict ensures constitutional amendments can be challenged in court, preventing arbitrary changes.
He stated that if amendments cannot be challenged, anyone could modify the Constitution as they wish. He further noted that the court's decision reaffirms that constitutional amendments must align with the basic structure and fundamental characteristics of the Constitution.
During the hearing, Chief Justice Ahmed Muthasim Adnan stated that the full bench of the court unanimously decided to move forward with the case. The panel includes Justices Dr. Azmiralda Zahir, Aisha Shujoon Mohamed, Mahaz Ali Zahir, Husnu Suood, Ali Rasheed Hussain, and Dr. Mohamed Ibrahim.
The case marks a significant legal battle over parliamentary representation and constitutional authority, with the Supreme Court now set to review the amendment’s validity.
